Today I will make a 5 brief comments in defense of traditional marriage. The first three of these rebuttals can be studied in further detail from Sherif Girgis and Ryan Anderson. I watched them both make presentations at the Wheatley Institution which can be viewed online. The last two are aimed at the LDS and Christian communities.
1. Arguement- Marriage is good, so it should not be exclusive. Marriage IS an emotional union & domestic life
Rebuttal- There are 3 inherent qualities of marriage that are accepted by Americans to counter this argument... 1) marriage pledges permenance, its not based on until emotional union dies. 2) Marriage IS exclusive, emotion can be shared with many (including things and animals).
Conclusion- To redefine marriage as an emotional union weakens the commitment. An emotional union has nothing to do with the 2 core qualities of marriage.
2. Arguement- Government has no reason to restrict marriage
Rebuttal- 1) the government's involvment in marriage is the least intrusive way to help children. Studies show that children need a mother and father because they offer unique gifts. 2) Marriage unites children to parents in a way that might otherwise be fragmented. 3) gay marriage is about desires of adults and weakens child rearing institution.
Conclusion- Government involvment affects the development of children which affects everyone.
3. Argument- Why not just let the gays live how they want. live and let live.
Rebuttal- 1) Gays are already permitted to live a gay life if they choose. 2) A new definition of marriage doesn't let others 'live and let live'. Churches, businesses, & freedoms of others are diminished.
Conclusion- New legislation is not necessary and will have the opposite affect of live & let live.
4. Argument- Homosexuality doesn't affect others
Rebuttal- read rebuttals for #2 and #3 above. Read Genesis 19:1-13. Read The Family: A Proclamation to the World "The disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets."
Conclusion- God destroys the communities and nations that support the disintegration of the family
5. Argument- God does not condemn homosexuality
Rebuttal- read Lev 18:22, Lev 20:13, 1 Cor 6:9-10, Rom 1:26-28, Gen 19:4-13
Conclusion- God in the Bible does speak against homosexuality very clearly both in the New and Old Testaments
Much more could be said on this issue, but these are just some 'notes'. A whole other can of worms opens up when arguments about how this affects our freedoms, but I will save that for a future post. I do believe that more can be done to help homosexual couples with hospital visits and estate transfer upon death, however I don't agree that redefining marriage is the answer for these minor issues.